yes, that is right. doug
Georg Homola wrote: > Hi, > > following these refs I've found on the list and the mri_glmfit help, I > assume the cluster-wise probability of the permutation simulation is based > on cluster mass inference, is that right? > > Thanks, > Georg > > > Statistical Science 2004, Vol. 19, No. 4, 676-685 > Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2004 Permutation Methods: A Basis for > Exact Inference Michael D. Ernst > > Human Brain Mapping 15:1-25(2001) > Nonparametric Permutation Tests For Functional Neuroimaging: A Primer with > Examples > Thomas E. Nichols and Andrew P. Holmes > > Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods > Satoru Hayasaka and Thomas E. Nichols, NI, 20 (2003) 2343-2356. > > Hagler and Sereno, NI, 2006, vol 33 1093-1103. > Smoothing and cluster thresholding for cortical surface-based group analysis > of fMRI data > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > -- Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. MGH-NMR Center gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting FileDrop: www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
