Hi, here's an email from Don Hagler from February 2009:
It seems to me that vertex areas in the native subject space are not > meaningful. The orig surfaces should be uniformly tesselated; however, > topology correction and final surface finding should introduce complicated > and probably uninteresting variation. > i couldn't find a direct reply to this remark, hence my question: is this true? and if so, does this imply that native space surface measurements (as given in the aparc.stats file) are uninteresting for statistical analysis? best, -joost
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
