yes, you can. There's no right answer for FWHM, but people usually use
5-20mm.
doug
Zhangyuanchao wrote:
When I compare the thickness measure among subjects, I have to
resample and smooth the thickness, so that each data have the same
number of vertices and which are in correspondence with one another
across subjects.
Now I have .curv files or .sulc files for each subject and would like
to make group analysis for these datasets. To compare the
curvature and sulc measures, can I follow the same procedures as above
( ie I repeat the resampling and smoothing steps as I do for
thickness)? If yes, how should I choose FWHM？
By the way, could you recommend me relevant papers that calculates the
following indices :
k1 maximum curvature
k2 minimum curvature
K Gaussian = k1*k2
H Mean = 0.5*(k1+k2)
C Curvedness = sqrt(0.5*(k1*k1+k2*k2))
S Sharpness = (k1 - k2)^2
BE Bending Energy = k1*k1 + k2*k2
SI Shape Index = atan((k1+k2)/(k2-k1))
FI Folding Index = |k1|*(|k1| - |k2|)
.sulc,
.curv
So that I can get a better understanding of what the above measures
reflects.
Thanks a lot!
yczhang
------------------------------------------------------------------------
好玩贺卡等你发，邮箱贺卡全新上线！
<http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tagline/card/*http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422
In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in:
surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
