Hi Doug, Thank you for your clarification. I checked Randy Buckner's paper, and it did include the CSF based on my interpretation of the paper's Fig. 3 images of the manual tracings in atlas space.
john On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote: > > The eTIV we report is not based on counting voxels inside the skull. > Instead, it is based on a statistical relationship between the TIV computed > from a manual segmentation and the talairach transfrom (see Randy Buckner's > paper). I don't know whether the original manual segs included CSF (I assume > it did). > > doug > > John Drozd wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have a question about the eTIV intracranial volume calculation. >> >> My question is: >> >> Does the eTIV intracranial volume include everything interior to the outer >> pial surface >> (excluding the skull, eyes, neck and dura), and does it also include the >> CSF? >> >> That's all. >> Thank you for your time. >> >> john drozd >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> > > -- > Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D. > MGH-NMR Center > gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422 > > In order to help us help you, please follow the steps in: > surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting > > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
