Hi,
I have fitted a glm with three different groups, using mri_glmfit (FS
v4.0.3). I use the beta.mgh to get the adjusted means within an ROI,
for each group. I'd like to make a bar or box diagram with the adjusted
means/betas, but I'm not sure how to get the standard error of the betas so
I can make error bars or a confidence interval.

It seems that mris_anatomical_stats won't take the beta.mgh as input. Is
there another way to do this in FS? Or will I have to do it outside FS?

All my contrasts have only one vector, so each comparison should reduce to a
t-test (according to the Wiki). In general, given the p (sig.mgh) and df of
a t-test, I can get the t-value, and given the difference between the betas,
the df and the t, I can get the SE. But I assume this is a little more
complicated than that?  I guess I can't use the rvar.mgh or rstd.mgh, since
these are based on the whole model and not just the two groups.

Which brings me to a related question: In mri_glmfit, when you have more
than two groups in your model, and perhaps also e.g. age as a continuous
regressor, and you set a contrast to compare two of the groups, does the
variance estimate (SE) include the variance of all the variables, i.e. all
groups that are in the model including the ones not included in the
comparison + whatever covariates there may be? If so, isn't it really closer
to a Tukey's or Scheffe's than an ordinary t-test?

But back to my main question: Is there a way to get a measure of dispersion
or confidence for the betas associated with each of the three groups in my
analysis? (And if there is, I probably can't just average that measure
across all vertices in the ROI, right?)




Thank you!

-- 
yours,
LMR
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to