Many thanks for your e-mail, Bruce. Yes, I've inspected all data, and one of the things that makes me more worried is that I had to edit many subjects in this area because there was WM/GM that was cut. So, just in case you have previous results of mean cortical thickness for this area, would it be possible to let me know? I couldn't find that in any paper.
Many thanks, Lucia > Hi Lucia, > > temporal pole is among the thickest cortical regions, but you should > visually inspect your data to check that it is accurate. > > cheers, > Bruce > > > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Lucia Garrido wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I'm comparing average cortical thickness values between groups using >> regions defined in the aparc files. I find significant differences in >> the >> right temporal pole. I was expecting difference here, but I'm concerned >> about the mean values of thickness. For controls, that value is 4.01, >> whereas in the left temporal pole is 3.80. Could anyone let me know if >> these values look too high? >> >> Thank you very much. >> >> best wishes, >> >> lucia >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
