Yep. That would explain it. Thanks!
---------
Jim Porter
Graduate Student
Clinical Science & Psychopathology Research
University of Minnesota
Doug Greve wrote:
The values in the mgh file should be -log10(abs(CWP)). Would that
explain the discrepancy?
James N Porter wrote:
Hello-
When I look at the CWP results of mri_surfcluster in the
sig.cluster.sum versus the resultant sig.cluster.mgh, the results are
different. Specifically, all clusters negatively correlated with my
independent variable display a value in tksurfer of -1+CWP, and
clusters that are positively correlated display a value of 1-CWP.
Which values should I believe as my actual p-values, the .sum's CWP
or the .mgh's added/subtracted values?
Thanks for your help,
---------
Jim Porter
Graduate Student
Clinical Science & Psychopathology Research
University of Minnesota
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
