I feel somewhat uneasy simply assuming that the process worked just
because it didn't exit with an error. Is my concern misplaced?
Should I feel happy about submitting a ms based on freesurfer analyses
that have not been independently checked?
If it is necessary/advisable to do some independent checking, are
there a couple of simple things (later reconstructions) that can be
checked that indicate whether all is fine, or whether it is necessary
to go back and check systematically each of the various stages
documented on the wiki pages?
simon
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:17:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] checking problems
To: Feng-Xian Yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freesurfer <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5"
Hi,
we don't usually stop and check anymore as things fail pretty
rarely. You
can look at the tutorial on the wiki for examples of the types of
failures
and how to fix them.
cheers,
Bruce
On
Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Feng-Xian Yan wrote:
Hi,
I have some confusion. When I completely run the command, recon-all
¡Vs x249 ¡Vautorecon1, and I should stop to check for problems with
intensity normalization, talairach transformation and skull
stripping.
How can I do to check these problems? And, which is I must do first?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
