I don't think so, but maybe I don't understand. The parcellations are
defined on the surfaces, so if they look okay you should be all set (they
can't be misregistered)
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS)
[E] wrote:
But is there any possibility that the mismatch between the two
interfaces (old and new version) render the output wrong?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:17 PM
To: Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS) [E]
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] (no subject)
you should be able to
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Bagnato, Francesca (NIH/NINDS) [E] wrote:
Can I open images parcellated with an old version of freesurfer (the
one parcellating 80 regions) with the new one (based upon the Desikan
atals)?
Thanks,
Francesca
Francesca Bagnato, MD-PhD
Staff Scientist, NIB-NINDS-NIH
Building 10, Room 5S205
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD, 20892-1400 MSC
Phone #: (301) 594-1415
Fax #: (301) 402-0373
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
