usually we mask them out so they are zero. What version are you using? In
the most recent versions they shouldn't be an effect there, but it's
something we fixed relatively recently.
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Durastanti, Valentina
(NIH/NINDS) [F] wrote:
Ok, but can you explain me why it marks those regions? Just to know
because I need to explain the meaning of this results and I really don't
know how!
thanks
Valentina
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:50 AM
To: Durastanti, Valentina (NIH/NINDS) [F]
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: regional cortical thickness
Hi Valentina,
you should ignore the noncortical regions like this one. The thickness
maps are meaningless there.
cheers,
Bruce
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Durastanti, Valentina
(NIH/NINDS) [F] wrote:
Hi,
I used the statistical parametric map provided by Freesurfer to
evaluate
the differences in mean cortical thickness and the software marked an
area (in red) located under the corpus callosum, in a region the does
not correspond to any of the 34 regions of the atlas (unlabeled
sub-cortical region). How I have to interpreter this result?
thanks
Valentina
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
