i'm currently doing two other 64-bit ports (ppc64 and x86_64). so we are certainly working on that. we'll see what it actually entails once we have a copy of tiger to play with :)
--vicka On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:38:14PM -0400, Ray Fix wrote: > FWIW, it looks like Mac OSX Tiger will be able to address 64 bits of > virtual memory. Finally, eh. Any plans to utilize this in a future > release of FS? > > http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/64bit.html > > Ray > > > On Apr 15, 2004, at 9:38 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > > > Hi Nick, > > > > unfortunately, os/x doesn't allow you to address more than 4G either. > > On > > the bright side though, we have a couple of opteron machines around > > that we > > are actively trying to port to, so I suspect we'll have a 64 bit > > version > > sometime in the next couple of months. We'll let people know when it's > > ready (you're welcome to be a beta site). > > > > Bruce > > > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Nick Knouf wrote: > > > >> On Apr 15, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Yasunari Tosa wrote: > >>> Currently, "recon-all" script can take the option of "-cm" (conform > >>> to > >>> min voxel size). > >>> This may end up creating more slices than 256, but freesurfer should > >>> be able to handle > >>> as long as there are enough memory left. Make sure that you have 2 > >>> Gbyte of > >>> memory and 2 GByte of swap space. Here, we are approaching the 32 > >>> bit memory > >>> address limit. > >> > >> {snip} > >> > >> This 2gig, 32 bit limit is something I'm starting to worry about. > >> With > >> resolutions of functional data ever increasing, we're getting to the > >> point where it's likely we'll need to address more than 2 gigs of > >> memory in the next year or two. > >> > >> Are there any plans to address this? I'm not sure what you can do > >> with > >> FS-FAST, since it depends on Matlab and I don't know if there are > >> 64-bit versions of matlab available (especially for affordable > >> platforms like AMD64 and the G5). > >> > >> <aside> > >> I'll insert my plug for moving FS-FAST to python here, as python > >> natively works on 64 bit platforms. > >> </aside> > >> > >> But with Freesurfer, how hard will it be to build a 64 bit version? > >> If > >> you need a testing machine, I'm working from a dual G5 that would be > >> more than happy to build Freesurfer :-) > >> > >> Nick > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Freesurfer mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Freesurfer mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
