Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote:
NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead.
rob
Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to
reference ticket 1635.
This all looks good. But I was thinking - why don't we use the locking
interface from slapi-plugin.h? I mean slapi_new_rwlock(),
slapi_rwlock_rdlock etc. implemented in BZ 730387. It would let us
abstract from underlying locking details (pthread versus NSPR) and just
use the slapi plugin interface + save possible changes to locking
mechanism in the future.
Martin
The 389-ds team suggested I go ahead with the pthread fix as their api
may not be complete soon.
rob
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
