On 24.08.2011 13:15, Martin Kosek wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Rob Crittenden wrote: >> NSPR PR_RWLocks are not re-entrant, use pthread read-write locks instead. >> >> rob > > Reference ticket in the commit message is wrong - I think you wanted to > reference ticket 1635. > > This all looks good. But I was thinking - why don't we use the locking > interface from slapi-plugin.h? I mean slapi_new_rwlock(), > slapi_rwlock_rdlock etc. implemented in BZ 730387. It would let us > abstract from underlying locking details (pthread versus NSPR) and just > use the slapi plugin interface + save possible changes to locking > mechanism in the future. Do we have any ETA for release of the bug? It is not yet released.
-- / Alexander Bokovoy _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
