On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 23:34, Eric Auer via Freedos-user
<freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> Interesting that MS Word for DOS looks a bit like EDIT, but
> with char style highlighting and a graphical preview :-D

Well, yes. They are both Common User Access apps.

MS Word for DOS up to v5.0 used its own UI, but 5.5 switched to become
a CUA app. MS-DOS EDIT, Qbasic, the MS Quick* languages, etc. all have
standard CUA interfaces.

It wasn't just an IBM/MS thing. Borland's Turbo* languages used it
too, and WordPerfect 5.x and 6.x for DOS have a CUA interface, along
with many other 1990s DOS apps.

IBM CUA is the standard UI for IBM SNA systems, DOS, OS/2, Windows,
and has also been adopted for most Linux desktops as well.

There's a history on Wikipedia -- I wrote most of it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Common_User_Access

Last year I helped find and recover the original IBM books, get them
converted to moden formats and put them on the Internet Archive:

https://archive.org/details/ibm-saa-cua-basic-interface-design-guide

Before they were only in an IBM format called .BOO:
https://archive.org/details/f29bdg00

I wrote an article about it earlier this year:
https://www.theregister.com/2024/01/24/rise_and_fall_of_cua/


-- 
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB: lpro...@gmail.com
Twitter/LinkedIn: lproven ~ Skype: liamproven
IoM: (+44) 7624 277612: UK: (+44) 7939-087884
Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053


_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to