> I want to get "1.3" finally wrapped up, and I'd like to have a > "2.0" someday. The NightDOS folks are working
english is not my first language so i could missread this. but doesn't 'folks are working' suggest a plurality of human being, opposed to the reality of a single guy who ever contributed, but is currently busy with other stuff > on their updated kernel - if they can get it working currently, after 5+ years of development they have functionality of a FreeDOS 512 byte bootsector: read a file from FAT16 into memory. that's it. > and still runs all 16-bit DOS applications, or run *ANY* application. > then we could include that as an alternative kernel > for people who (a) have a more modern system, and (b) opt-in to use it.** > ** But, NightDOS is a long way from being able to do that. The > goals of NightDOS are pretty lofty, and he has not the faintest idea how to get there. Tom _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user