El 29/01/2013 11:11 a.m., bruce.bowman tds.net escribio':
> Any improvements to the current editors would be nice, but the
> following things don't strike me as particularly important:
>
> -- external fonts
> -- what language it was written in
> -- built-in BASIC interpreter
> -- calendar
>
> My biggest complaint about currently available editors are their
> restrictions on file size. A new editor should page the file in from
> disk as needed so as to avoid this restriction.
>
> It also seems like overkill for a text editor to operate in a graphics mode.
>
> Bruce
>
Do you propose built-in Basic language as macro language for text
processing? or a qbasic-like integrated IDE useable as editor?
I prefer a good text editor with the ability to launch aplication to
process the edited text, so you can launch any external language
interpreter.
Best regards
--
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Marco A. Achury
Tel: +58-(212)-6158777
Cel: +58-(414)-3142282
Skype: marcoachury
http://www.achury.com.ve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
