On 07/08/2012 09:45 PM, Nick M. Daly wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 16:25:54 +0300, Michiel de Jong wrote:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Michael Rauch wrote:
with PageKite, this probably leads to registering a domain name for
a box...
or subdomain, which saves money.
with Tor HS, no need to register a domain...
for mainstream users that would mean going via tor2web, so effectively
still a reverse proxy setup.
For the record, I'd like to see what comes of both the PK and THS
approaches. PK seems easier, while THS seems more robust (it'll take a
lot more than some ICE paperwork to corrupt the Tor directory servers).
Box-to-box communication can be much simpler and is where I've been
focusing most of my time. Thanks for looking into these harder
problems.
i think too that Tor HS (+FreedomBuddy) is mostly an advantage for interbox
communication and a time when app usage might mean, that a user logs-in to his
fbx where information gets pulled together for him.
for the integration in the web-of-today (role:server) it's more of a handicap.
_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
