On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Markus Sabadello <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Michiel de Jong <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Markus Sabadello >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > My understanding is that it would be a transparent proxy, i.e. it >> > captures >> > all connections. >> > So you don't have to configure anything on the client devices, they get >> > privoxyfied automatically if they use the FreedomBox wifi. >> >> OK, so do i understand correctly that the hardware we're targetting >> will emit a wifi signal? Presumably a person who buys a freedombox, >> already has a router at home with wifi and probably also between 1 and >> 4 ethernet sockets. How will they deploy the freedombox? link the >> freedombox and the router by ethernet (i guess that would dhcp without >> need for any config on most routers, right?), and reconfigure their >> laptop and phone to forget the old wifi network and start to use the >> new freedombox wifi? > > Hmm yeah I think that's how I imagined it. > Of course then people would have 2 wifis, not sure if that's good or bad. > Good, because I think it would easily work with the setup that most people > have at home. > Good also, because you can always choose to NOT use the FreedomBox. > Bad, because it might be a more complex setup than it needs to be. > Anyway I would be interested in Nick's opinion. > Guess there is some overlap with the other thread here (FreedomBox as home > router).
any decision on this? will we target hardware that is capable of emitting a (second) wifi signal in the home? _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
