Follow-up Comment #4, patch #4940 (project freeciv):
Yes, but the switch statement is unfortunate, and probably causes more of a
slowdown than whether we pass a pointer or a struct containing an enum and a
pointer. My thought is to replace all the callers with macros that call a
common (callback-based) implementation, which should retain the current
performance with smaller code-size and greater ease of extension (my primary
interest here).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/patch/?4940>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
