Em 11/12/2010 16:57, Leandro Keffer escreveu: > Ja tive o mesmo problema e com a mesma NIC inumeras vezes, não sou favoravel > NICs 3com, de preferencia a broadcom e intel. > realtek e 3com na minha opinião e por experiencias são péssimas. > > Em 11 de dezembro de 2010 17:19, Fabiano Carlos Heringer< > b...@grupoheringer.com.br> escreveu: > >> Pessoal, to com um problema que tá me tirando o sono, >> >> de uma hora pra outra, meu gateway um FreeBSD8.0-RELEASE começa a ficar >> com os pings nas alturas, para qualquer estacao da rede... >> >> PING 10.0.0.29 (10.0.0.29): 56 data bytes >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=60.318 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=285.742 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=316.280 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=297.772 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=252.032 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=198.022 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=300.550 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=362.574 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=8 ttl=128 time=306.901 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=9 ttl=128 time=351.775 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=10 ttl=128 time=426.242 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=11 ttl=128 time=387.190 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=12 ttl=128 time=208.324 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=13 ttl=128 time=220.007 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=14 ttl=128 time=190.634 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=15 ttl=128 time=302.118 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=16 ttl=128 time=181.868 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=17 ttl=128 time=280.190 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=19 ttl=128 time=288.460 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=20 ttl=128 time=191.378 ms >> ping: sendto: No buffer space available >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=21 ttl=128 time=459.408 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=22 ttl=128 time=354.824 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=23 ttl=128 time=227.251 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=24 ttl=128 time=243.110 ms >> 64 bytes from 10.0.0.29: icmp_seq=25 ttl=128 time=399.936 ms >> >> se eu pingar entre estacoes fica tudo normal, sinal que o problema é com >> gateway, sem regras de controle, sem PF ativado. >> >> meus buffers: >> >> 400/920/1320 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) >> 398/718/1116/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >> 397/245 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) >> 0/239/239/16384 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use >> (current/cache/total/max) >> 0/0/0/8192 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >> 0/0/0/4096 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) >> 896K/2622K/3518K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) >> 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) >> 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) >> 0/7/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) >> 0 requests for sfbufs denied >> 0 requests for sfbufs delayed >> 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile >> 0 calls to protocol drain routines >> >> >> Minha interface é uma 3com 3c509. >> >> Alguma sugestao? >> >> Obrigado >> >> ------------------------- >> Histórico: http://www.fug.com.br/historico/html/freebsd/ >> Sair da lista: https://www.fug.com.br/mailman/listinfo/freebsd >> > ------------------------- > Histórico: http://www.fug.com.br/historico/html/freebsd/ > Sair da lista: https://www.fug.com.br/mailman/listinfo/freebsd > sempre achei que 3com eram boas... tenho uma intel na outra interface (externa) , vou comprar uma na segunda entao...
tem algum modelo q recomenda? Abracos ------------------------- Histórico: http://www.fug.com.br/historico/html/freebsd/ Sair da lista: https://www.fug.com.br/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
