On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 February 2013 18:21, PseudoCylon <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hm, that sounds right, what's the code doing wrong? >> >> Currently, it seems the sta sends back ht params the ap included in a >> PROBE_RESP packet. So, the ap could send ampdu packets bigger (in >> byte) than the sta can handle or packet gaps are different from the >> sta wants after ba session is created. (During ba session negotiation, >> these params are not exchanged, only window sizes (frame count), seq >> #, and token.) > > Right. yes, we should be negotiating the ampdu density to be the > maximum of what the AP and STA can associate. > > Same deal with IBSS peers (and mesh peers too, eventually.)
Yes. But because of this test http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/net80211/ieee80211_ht.c#L2649 only nodes in sta mode are affected. AK > > > > Adrian _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
