Hm, that sounds right, what's the code doing wrong?
Adrian On 15 February 2013 17:09, PseudoCylon <[email protected]> wrote: > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/net80211/ieee80211_ht.c?#L2656 > Shouldn't a sta include iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density instead > when associating? > > 1) A driver initiates iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density based on h/w > capabilities. > > 2) When a sta trying to associate, > ieee80211_send_mgmt() > { > case IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_ASSOC_REQ: > ieee80211_add_htcap(); /* the function in question */ > } > > 3) When an ap receives the assoc_req packet, the ap will save ht > params to ni_htparam. Then the ap will use those values for Tx > packets. > > 4) The sta will receive packets which size is within the limits if the > sta included iv_ampdu_rxmax and iv_ampdu_density. > > > AK > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
