On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:01:27 -0800
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> cpghost wrote:
> > On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800
> > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> >>> ----------- manually restarting ppp(1), then:
> >>> ------------------------
> >>>
> >>> 17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype
> >>> PPPoE D (0x8863), length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x40C663C1]
> >>>   [Service-Name]
> >>>
> >>> 17:10:47.306939 00:00:24:c2:45:74 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype
> >>> PPPoE D (0x8863), length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC06220C1]
> >>>   [Service-Name]
> >>>
> >> we still have 2 sessions instead of 1, but there is less confusion 
> >> so things sort themselves out.
> > 
> > Just one more thing:
> > 
> > If I remember correctly, sending two PADIs in quick succession
> > was ppp's "normal" behaviour for *years* now (is it expected or
> > required by the protocol? I don't know). I've always wondered
> > why it was so. But that didn't cause any harm as it seemed one
> > of the two PADO was picked up and eventually turned into a session.
> > 
> > -cpghost.
> > 
> 
> btw try mpd as well.

So... I'm running net/mpd5 on that router for a few days now, and
it managed 3 forced disconnects in a row and no session chaos at
all, while ppp(8) would probably have initiated a lot of parallel
sessions again but no connection.

So up until now (but perhaps it's too early to be sure?),
net/mpd5 is fine, while ppp(8) is not.

Btw, I've compared the sources of ppp(8) from 2007-09-24/25
when it was still working, and 2007-11-30 when I've updated
the router, and there's NO difference there at all. Whatever
broke ppp(8), it was not ppp(8) but something else
(I suspect ng_pppoe.c): maybe the code clean up exposed
some hidden bug in ppp(8)?

I hope ppp(8) will be fixed before 6.3-RELEASE; even though
net/mpd5 is excellent and very snappy as well. ;-)

Regards,
-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to