>
> On Thursday 25 October 2007, Ken Smith wrote:
> > Sorry, I had a bit of a false start with 7.0-BETA1. I've got sets
> > of build machines used for the Monthly Snapshots and procedures in
> > place to try and minimize the mistakes I could make while doing
> > those Snapshots (previously one set for HEAD, one set for
> > RELENG_6). The set of machines I'll be using for the 7.0-RELEASE
> > build are the ones that had previously been doing the HEAD
> > snapshots and I missed doing one very important adjustment to the
> > build routine while doing the BETA1 builds, which resulted in the
> > builds being based on HEAD. I didn't notice during the tests I do
> > before uploading it because the build procedure makes most things
> > (e.g. uname) say what you told it to build, you need to look harder
> > to discover that sort of mistake. So, 7.0-BETA1 actually should
> > have been called something more like 8.0-SURPRISE... :-(
> >
> > Sorry for the screw-up.
> >
>
> This change seems to break portupgrade. It complains that it cannot
> parse the output of uname. I think it is not capable of handling the
> 1.5 after the BETA.
>
I hadn't tried that... When you do build a new kernel, it
goes back to BETA1 though.
Tuc
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
