On Thursday 25 October 2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 October 2007, Ken Smith wrote:
> > > Sorry, I had a bit of a false start with 7.0-BETA1. I've got
> > > sets of build machines used for the Monthly Snapshots and
> > > procedures in place to try and minimize the mistakes I could
> > > make while doing those Snapshots (previously one set for HEAD,
> > > one set for RELENG_6). The set of machines I'll be using for
> > > the 7.0-RELEASE build are the ones that had previously been
> > > doing the HEAD snapshots and I missed doing one very important
> > > adjustment to the build routine while doing the BETA1 builds,
> > > which resulted in the builds being based on HEAD. I didn't
> > > notice during the tests I do before uploading it because the
> > > build procedure makes most things (e.g. uname) say what you
> > > told it to build, you need to look harder to discover that sort
> > > of mistake. So, 7.0-BETA1 actually should have been called
> > > something more like 8.0-SURPRISE... :-(
> > >
> > > Sorry for the screw-up.
> >
> > This change seems to break portupgrade. It complains that it
> > cannot parse the output of uname. I think it is not capable of
> > handling the 1.5 after the BETA.
>
> I hadn't tried that... When you do build a new kernel, it
> goes back to BETA1 though.
>
> Tuc
Or you can take care of it by setenvr until then.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
