On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:57:41AM +0100, Robin Gruyters wrote: > I have the same problem here. At the moment I only have two servers > upgraded from FreeBSD 5.4R to FreeBSD 6.1R and one to FreeBSD 6.2R. > > And here is the netstat -ni output from our development server: > > [netstat -ni] > Name Mtu Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll > ste0* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 > ste1* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 > ste2* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 > ste3* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 > bge0 1500 9866912 2114443 18835209 0 0 > bge0 1500 2004841 - 18833483 - - > bge0 1500 1723393 - 1719554 - - > bge0 1500 82 - 66 - - > bge0 1500 19036813 - 14796159 - - > bge0 1500 38709278 - 35167554 - - > bge0 1500 0 - 0 - - > bge0 1500 621 - 0 - - > bge0 1500 1716 - 0 - - > bge0 1500 184 - 0 - - > bge0 1500 52881 - 2336 - - > bge1* 1500 0 0 0 0 0 > pflog 33208 0 0 0 0 > lo0 16384 0 51692624 0 0 > lo0 16384 6611 - 6611 - - > [...] > > Is there a fix for it already, or maybe a workaround?
The problem was that the driver code was not properly obtaining error statistics from the Broadcom chip, thus errors _were_ (before the fix) not being calculated/accounted for. Now (after the fix) errors are being accounted for correctly. So the errors you see in your netstat output are probably real/ ccurate. I'll vote for a duplex-related problem or some naughty cabling. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"