At 08:09 PM 5/21/2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
We did ourselves a big disservice by not pointing out clearly in the
todo list that most of the listed problems are VERY RARE and are
unlikely to affect most/all users. In future we're going to have to
be clearer about that, because you're not the only user who was scared
for no reason.
We really had to push FreeBSD hard to find those problems;
The servers I build are pushed really hard.
6.1 stands
up to enormous test loads that all previous tested releases could not
handle. I wouldn't be surprised if 4.x cannot handle the same
workloads, simply because no-one may have ever attempted such loads on
a 4.x system.
Kris
P.S. If you're willing to put some effort into analyzing and profiling
it, I'd be willing to work with you on your performance problem.
You sound like one of those e-mails I keep getting offering to help
me with my, er, performance problems. ;-)
Seriously: The problem is that in my tests 6.x does not surpass Linux in
performance, while 4.11 does.
--Brett Glass
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
