Mark Linimon wrote:
Make Jakubik wrote:
FreeBSD users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an
influx of new bells and whistles just before the release [...] I fully
understand that this is a volunteer project [...]
I'm sorry, but the former statement proves the latter false.
Let's try to do our Semi-Annual Refresher Course On Open Source Development:
Mark, you bring up a lot of valid points, which i agree with. Maybe i
needed a refresher. I can certainly understand the developers loosing
interest when they are denied the ability to work on what they are
themselves interested in. Perhaps a frequent release cycle is the
answer. However, i think things should stay in -CURRENT a bit longer
before they make it to -STABLE, i.e. the openbsd dhcp client import
caused a lot of problems. In any case, i am grateful to all the
contributors and quite happy with what FreeBSD is today, so there wont
be any more complains from me on this subject, i vented my steam, and
got a refresh on reality.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
