On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Warner Losh wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100
Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The interesting point is: why does it build on my real sparc (2-UII CPUs,
512MByte memory), but not on the tinderbox. Is there something about the
crosscompiler that is different?
Different CFLAGS perhaps?
These different CFLAGS have been a source of unending problems. I've
broken the tinderbox build a couple of times when my LINT build worked
w/o hassle. And I got grumped at it, even though I did everything
right. Maybe we can build the interbox with a set of standard, well
known flags?
Warner
In this particular case, the problem only shows up when the module builds
as part of the buildkernel target. It does not show up when the code is
built into thekernel nor when built as a standalone module. I think that
this inconsistency is actually more problematic.
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
