On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:54:14PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote.. > On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > [snip] > > WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox > WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox > WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. > WB> > WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as > WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. > > Well, why not take the portbuild approach then? > > Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and > *also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental > source patches...
Probably needs more hardware to keep a reasonable tinderbox frequency. -- Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
