On Friday 23 December 2005 16:12, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > El Viernes, 23 de Diciembre de 2005 15:38, Florent Thoumie escribió: > > On Friday 23 December 2005 15:19, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > > I'm not sure this is the way to go, but ... > > > > > > Can someone put a document on what is the desired model? I think > > > we have too much little pieces of disperse notes about this. > > > > > > Also, some working notes about ports and RELENG_4/RELENG_5 src > > > issues will be of interest. > > > > > > Hope this can be tweak in time for 6.1 (Jan). > > > > Convert your old script to rcNG scripts and use USE_RC_SUBR= > > script.sh. Ensure that the rcorder preamble contains meaningful > > keywords (PROVIDES, REQUIRES, BEFORE, ...) for all your rcNG scripts. > > bsd.port.mk should do the rest. > > Some time working with binary oriented software systems have teach me > that simple changes may become harder when size and numbers grow up. I > think this may be even harder with a non-binary oriented system like > ports. > > But this doesn't solve the real problem. We've lost a reference model > about rc and the interaction with the base system and ports. > > - some kinda of style for ports/system rc scripts
?
> - some docs about keywords and stage support
It's quite simple enough but yar wrote an article about it :
http://people.freebsd.org/~yar/rcng/article.html
I thought it already made it to the doc tree.
> - some kinda of timeline model
There's one.
Commit, MFC, fix broken ports.
--
Florent Thoumie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Committer
pgp1HMFMmWWyU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
