On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:04:58PM +0400, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > > > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any > > > > > > dependencies registered? A quick check shows that they are almost > > > > > > the > > > > > > only libs in /usr/lib that have zero output from ldd. > > > > > > > > > > Probably they are statically linked. > > > > > > > > No, static libraries don't come with an .so extension. :-) > > > > > > No, you missed my point. I mean that kerberos libs are dynamic but > > > linked against other libraries statically. > > > > If they were, there would be no problem in the first place. > > Sorry, it seems I missed a part of the thread.
Either the ports that use libkrb5 must know its dependencies or they must be encoded in the shared library's header as dependencies. I vote for #1 because it's too late for #2. See previous post about how to solve this. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
