On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 02:44:48AM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Jon Dama wrote: > >yes, that's quite generous. > > > >why isn't /tmp just an mfs mount though? > > While I like that suggestion personally, some people get perturbed about > files in /tmp going away if the power fails or you reboot.
I wish mount_mfs would be smarter on post 4.x systems. Using mount_mfs means it works in compatibility mode. This might seem to be a good idea but it praxis it prevents tuning the mfs parameters: in mfs mode I can't set UFS version, I can't inhibit the .snap directory. Gunther _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
