C. Michailidis wrote: > Remember, I'm talking about the 'path of least resistance', I understand that > I could label the slice manually with any number of different configurations. > The issue I was hoping to shed some light on is... "Can the auto-configuration > mechanism stand to be improved?". Is it reasonable (in today's era of dirt > cheap > disk space) to have a mere 256MB allocated to /tmp (or /var or even /) by > default?
The default sizes are now currently 512 MB for / and /tmp, and 1024 MB plus space for one crashdump on /var. If anything, these are vast overkill for most systems; on /, for example, it is hard to imagine a situation where a normal user would use more than 150MB of space unless they were doing something which they shouldn't be doing. Colin Percival _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
