On 1/30/2016 12:26 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
>
> Ah, okay, that at least makes sense. Can you please verify that with
> the attached patch applied, you have a setup that works out of the
> box?
>
Hi,
The patch does not apply cleanly
# patch < em_tso_gig_only_10.diff
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
|===================================================================
|--- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (revision 294962)
|+++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (working copy)
--------------------------
Patching file sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 1377.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c.rej
done
# cat sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c.rej
@@ -1377,8 +1377,15 @@
ifp->if_hwassist = 0;
if (ifp->if_capenable & IFCAP_TXCSUM)
ifp->if_hwassist |= (CSUM_TCP | CSUM_UDP);
- if (ifp->if_capenable & IFCAP_TSO4)
- ifp->if_hwassist |= CSUM_TSO;
+ /*
+ ** There have proven to be problems with TSO when not
+ ** at full gigabit speed, so disable the assist automatically
+ ** when at lower speeds. -jfv
+ */
+ if (ifp->if_capenable & IFCAP_TSO4) {
+ if (adapter->link_speed == SPEED_1000)
+ ifp->if_hwassist |= CSUM_TSO;
+ }
/* Configure for OS presence */
em_init_manageability(adapter);
--
-------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
