On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:08:28PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Pete,
> 
> On Fri, 24 May 2013, Pete French wrote:
> 
> > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291
> > ...
> > > The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related 
> > > scripts 
> > > which one use in production.
> > 
> > 
> > Any chance we could do this is 2 stages - first being to add 'list' to give 
> > us a chnace
> > ti change scripts over, then make the chnages to 'status'. I have scripts
> > which try and parse the outut from 'status' which will need changing,
> > and I sspect I am not the only one...
> 
> I see no problem with this, as it is one-lite patch (modulo usage/manual page 
> changes); it would be direct commit to -stable, but as it is temporary, I see 
> no problem there too.
> 
> Mikolaj, your opinion?

It looks like a very good idea.

-- 
Mikolaj Golub
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to