On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:54:56AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291 > > (the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to one-liner > per > provider; old output is retained as `list' command) > > to at least stable/9 ? If we agreed to merge, I would prefer to both stable/9 and 8 to have divergence between branches as minimal as possible.
> The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related > scripts > which one use in production. > > If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from trociny, > thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks. > > Thanks! > > -- > Sincerely, > D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] > [ FreeBSD committer: ma...@freebsd.org ] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- ma...@rinet.ru *** > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Mikolaj Golub _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
