On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:09:58 +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:06:47 -0800 Derek Kulinski <tak...@takeda.tk> > wrote: > >> "Sergey V. Dyatko" <sergey.dya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >You may: >> >1/ install subversion on some host/jail 2/ do svn export ( f.e. >> >svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9 stable_9) >> >3/ tar it 4/ on 'client' fetch(1)/scp/rsync tarball >> > >> >in that case you don't need svn on 'client', fetch and scp in base :) >> >> If you go through all of that why not just install the damn svn from >> ports? > > I have svn installed on all my boxes (for src and configs) ;-) > > >> I think you don't understand the reason why people are asking for this. >> I personally experienced the need not long ago. I had stable/9 branch >> and wanted to downgrade to 9.0. The entire process went well until I >> rebooted the system, to see tons of errors in pretty much everything >> that was compiled from ports. Instead recompiling them from scratch I >> just decided to go ahead and upgrade to 9.1 which was not officially >> released yet. >> > how in this case you would have helped availability lite-svn-client on > base ? > >> And of course I could not perform svn sw because svn was broken too. > r232944 | lev | 2009-04-29 15:11:17 +0300 ... > (3) Add STATIC option to build only static binaries [2] > ... > >> And since svn has tons of dependencies it took me nearly an hour to >> recompile them (portupgrade and Ruby were broken too). >> >> > that's why I don't use portupgrade for a long time;-) > use portmaster WTF
Portupgrade works fine for me. What's the problem with it? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
