On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:06:47 -0800 Derek Kulinski <tak...@takeda.tk> wrote:
> "Sergey V. Dyatko" <sergey.dya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >You may: > >1/ install subversion on some host/jail > >2/ do svn export ( f.e. svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9 stable_9) > >3/ tar it > >4/ on 'client' fetch(1)/scp/rsync tarball > > > >in that case you don't need svn on 'client', fetch and scp in base :) > > If you go through all of that why not just install the damn svn from > ports? I have svn installed on all my boxes (for src and configs) ;-) > > I think you don't understand the reason why people are asking for > this. I personally experienced the need not long ago. I had stable/9 > branch and wanted to downgrade to 9.0. The entire process went well > until I rebooted the system, to see tons of errors in pretty much > everything that was compiled from ports. Instead recompiling them > from scratch I just decided to go ahead and upgrade to 9.1 which was > not officially released yet. > how in this case you would have helped availability lite-svn-client on base ? > And of course I could not perform svn sw because svn was broken too. r232944 | lev | 2009-04-29 15:11:17 +0300 ... (3) Add STATIC option to build only static binaries [2] ... > And since svn has tons of dependencies it took me nearly an hour to > recompile them (portupgrade and Ruby were broken too). > that's why I don't use portupgrade for a long time;-) use portmaster WTF -- wbr, tiger _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
