Hi Andriy Gapon! On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:33:57 +0300; Andriy Gapon wrote about 'Re: Policy for removing working code':
>> Good, perhaps even "necessary", but is it "sufficient"? Those >> following a -STABLE branch are expected to read stable@, but >> what about those who are following a security branch? > People, who care, are expected to read current@ and stable@ even if they use > only releases and security branches. At the very least, to see what's cooking > up for them and what to expect. Hey, by whom expected? They are NOT expected to do this! Can you quote some official docs or statements for this? > P.S. I am surprised that this thread isn't over yet and is being kept alive by > people who do not seem to use the feature in question or offer any work on it. > While people, who really need it, have already found a way forward for > themselves. Because this thread is not about this feature but about policy which will slowly bring FreeBSD project to troubles if nothing will be changed. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nucli...@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
