on 28/08/2010 01:03 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > On Friday 27 August 2010 04:19 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I still don't get your point. >> My point is that if the Intel's code gets the topology right, then >> the hardware is emulated properly and the problem is with the >> patch. >> What is your point? :) > > My point is "right" topology means nothing in this context if CPU > affinity of guest OS does not reflect hypervisor's point of view.
I see. And I just cared about the pretty message in dmesg, nothing more :-) -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
