On Friday 27 August 2010 04:19 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: > I still don't get your point. > My point is that if the Intel's code gets the topology right, then > the hardware is emulated properly and the problem is with the > patch. > What is your point? :)
My point is "right" topology means nothing in this context if CPU affinity of guest OS does not reflect hypervisor's point of view. Jung-uk Kim _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"