On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 09:01:15AM +0200, xer wrote: > Thank you Pyun > I found this another one: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=129352 > > And it seems a lot different.. which one will bet to try?
I think the patch in the PR is not right fix. Drivers should not rearm watchdog timeouts in Tx completion handler, otherwise it would hide root cause of timeouts. if_start handler should be the only place to arm the timer. Try attached patch in previous mail. > Regards > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Pyun YongHyeon" <pyu...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 6:43 AM > To: "xer" <xer...@hotmail.it> > Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: watchdog timeout > > > > >I vaguely remember there were a couple of reports on xl(4) watchdog > >timeouts. I'm not sure this came from missing Tx interrupts but > >would you try attached patch? > >Note, it was generated against HEAD and you should experiment the > >attached patch on local box prior to applying to your production > >server. > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
