On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Peter Wemm <pe...@wemm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanef...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:36, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look >>>>> into /usr/lib32 without additional -B switch? >>>>> -- >>>>> regards, Maciej Suszko. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't know if it should or should not, but I can confirm that this >>>> behavior was around in 7.0-RELEASE, so it's been that way for quite a >>>> while, at least in the 7 branch. >>>> >>> >>> Sigh. Read the list archives. It's been this way since Peter >>> Wemm first introduce the ability to run i386 binaries on >>> amd64. >>> >>> -- >>> Steve >> >> Ok, let's bury this topic then. >> Thanks for the confirmation and sorry for the noise. >> -Garrett > > A patch can be extraced from > http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/hammer.diff > that makes it "work", but its not right. It doesn't quite do -I > include overrides right when -m32 is specified. > > It's enough to make just about everything else work. I forgot that I > was building valgrind with it for some time now.
I'll give that a shot, provide some feedback, and see if I can *maybe* (shrugs) improve upon it. Thanks Peter! -Garrett _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
