On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanef...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 23, 2008, at 10:36, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:55:04PM -0500, Josh Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>> I also noticed that behavior, shouldn't compiler/linker look >>>> into /usr/lib32 without additional -B switch? >>>> -- >>>> regards, Maciej Suszko. >>>> >>> >>> I don't know if it should or should not, but I can confirm that this >>> behavior was around in 7.0-RELEASE, so it's been that way for quite a >>> while, at least in the 7 branch. >>> >> >> Sigh. Read the list archives. It's been this way since Peter >> Wemm first introduce the ability to run i386 binaries on >> amd64. >> >> -- >> Steve > > Ok, let's bury this topic then. > Thanks for the confirmation and sorry for the noise. > -Garrett
A patch can be extraced from http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/hammer.diff that makes it "work", but its not right. It doesn't quite do -I include overrides right when -m32 is specified. It's enough to make just about everything else work. I forgot that I was building valgrind with it for some time now. -- Peter Wemm - pe...@wemm.org; pe...@freebsd.org; pe...@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
