In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway writes: : I still think we should be recommending people use 'make buildkernel' to : build GENERIC and minimize the possibility of foot-shooting from a stupid : config file which then gets blamed on 4.0 itself. Besides, I tried to : rebuild my kernel from 3.4 using 'config' et al, but it didn't compile : because the PATH was wrong and it was using the 3.x compiler/linker. I agree with this. I think that creating /GENERIC isn't a big deal and I kinda like it. It is certainly less confusing than some of the alternatives. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instructions Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instruc... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instruc... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instruc... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instruc... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instruc... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade ins... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade ins... Warner Losh
- Re: "dangerously dedicated" Kent Stewart
- Re: "dangerously dedicated" Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instruc... Warner Losh
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade ins... Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instruc... William R. Somsky