On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 11:58:32AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Oleg Ogurok wrote:
>
> >
> > Does 4.0-STABLE exists?
>
> Yes. Of course since the 4.x branch has only just been born, there are
> likely to be some problems worked out over the course of the next few
> weeks, so please don't just slap this on a production server without
> testing first, etc :) Your testing will however be very valuable and help
> to improve the quality of the branch.
I've been wondering about this, as I have seen it go by a few times along
with almost-flames of all the people sure to go slap this on a server...
-STABLE is supposed to be safe to put on a server. If 4.x is .not. yet
safe... Why is it in -STABLE? This kinda bugs me as it fairly well defeats
the point of having a -STABLE if it isn't, in fact, stable.
Jamie
> Kris
>
> ----
> In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
> -- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
