On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:18:31PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> writes: > > Can you explain what is problem? > > Radical suggestion: read the first email in the thread.
I am read and don't understund (you talk about trouble of maintaining the HPN patches). I see patched version in ports. This version maintaining. What is problem? Differnt openssh? Quality of patches? Different branches? ports branch is worse (by some reaason) base branch? > > PS: As I today know, kerberos heimdal is practicaly dead as opensource > > project. Have FreeBSD planed switch to MIT Kerberos? I am know about > > security/krb5. > > We switched from MIT to Heimdal at some point in the past for some > reason I don't remember. MIT and Heimdal are *not* interchangeable at I think because MIT stop development in the past. > the source or binary level, so switching back is not trivial. I am know about this. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
