> On 11 Nov 2015, at 16:53 , Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 11/11/2015 8:51 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> writes: >>> Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper >>> support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth >>> keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port. >> >> I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still >> haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is far >> less intrusive than HPN. >> > > Yes, it's very small. > /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/files/extra-patch-tcpwrappers
And thanks to both of you for keeping it. It’s often the best you can get if you have machines which run w/o firewalls. Just wanted to say “thanks”! /bz _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
