Dear Ollivier and all,
I have problem with the portsnap: I maintain a private
"repository" under the /usr/ports: There is a /usr/ports/tmp where I store
new ports to be tested, and submitted. The portsnap is removing
unrecognized local files.
With cvsup I don't have such a problem.
I have no information about pkgng, whether I can maintain private
repository with pkgng or not?
Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Gary Palmer on Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 01:04:21PM -0500:
In other words: while signed updates via freebsd-update and portsnap
are great for a good chunk of users, they don't address everyones needs.
Hopefully, with the move toward kngng, there will be less need of portsnap (and
/usr/ports for that matter).
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- robe...@keltia.net
In memoriam to Ondine, our 2nd child: http://ondine.keltia.net/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
